People who work at offshore software testing are a vigorous bunch. They like testing, seeing results and retesting all the while waiting for something to break. And when that code breaks, hey, they will test that to see how many ways it can be broken. All of this is good, it’s part of the process of
developing a secure and reliable piece of software, a website or a mobile app. Which of course, is the goal of your quality assurance testers.
But there is one debate that has always been ‘in the air’ when it comes to testing anything when it comes to technology, but for our purposes we will keep the debate at just for software, website and mobile applications. The premise of the debate is simple, it starts with the question: Should testing be only automated? Or are there times when manual testing is important? Or is manual testing only a means to an end, simply waiting until an automated test is created to do the same task? And, when Get[Devs] takes it into its realm of the techno-sphere, the question morphs into: Should offshore software testing be automated only? Keeping manual testing in house and not offshore. Would that be more practical? Read More
When hiring QA testers and QA engineers, you want to find the best. those who are capable of getting the job done for you in a way that finds the bugs, they get fixed and the end user – your customers – never have to worry about it, let alone see it.
